最近投了一篇二区，过程颇为曲折，第一个审稿人给拒，第二个审稿人给接，所以找了第三个进行仲裁，幸好第三个审稿人给了比较好的意见。
现在收到大修的通知，但是收到的评审意见非常简短，response letter真的不知道该怎么回复。
而且现在情况依然不容乐观，这本期刊的每年发文量才100出头，但每年来稿量却很大，听大家讨论说即使大修也非常不稳。
以下贴出评审意见，请大家赐教一下该怎么回：
editors:
reviewer 1 claims there is insufficient novelty in your paper so please consider what you can do to enhance or emphasize it.
please check your equations carefully.
please check the language. the language/punctuation is incorrect or awkward in places.
剩下的具体细节不再说了，一些格式上的错误...
reviewer #1: the introduction states the purpose of the paper. however, the novelty of the research is small. also, i believe there are some simple mistakes.
reviewer #2: no comments on content and organization
minor corrections or suggestions:
具体细节不再说了，一些格式上的错误...
reviewer #3: the paper is well discussed. there are problems in the equations and sentences.
