你的文章几个审稿人？这样一般不会拒
就两个审稿人，第一个审稿人虽然意见里没直接写拒稿，但是填了建议其他杂志，这应该是编辑拒稿的原因吧
1. Please rate the importance of the reported results
Reviewer #1: Important
Reviewer #2: Highly important (top 20%)
--------------------
2. Please indicate whether the results discussed justify publication as a Research Article
Reviewer #1: Publish in another format
Reviewer #2: Publish as a Communication
--------------------
3. Please rate the citation of previous publications
Reviewer #1: Insufficient
Reviewer #2: Insufficient
--------------------
4. Please rate the length of the manuscript
Reviewer #1: Concise
Reviewer #2: Concise
--------------------
5. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data
Reviewer #1: Major inconsistencies
Reviewer #2: Fully consistent
--------------------
6. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate
Reviewer #1: ChemSusChem
Reviewer #2: (No Response)
--------------------
7. Please indicate whether you have included attachments
Reviewer #1: No
Reviewer #2: No
--------------------
8. Please rate the quality of the Supporting Information
Reviewer #1: Satisfactory
Reviewer #2: Satisfactory
