一审18天，审稿意见（审稿人1：小修，但讨论部分比较简单，建议好好改。审稿人2:小修），编辑给potentially interested in publishing the paper 。后续拒稿的的可能性大吗。给6周的修改时间（审稿人说讨论部分简单，但我其实感觉好好写了，大改起来难度还是挺大的，有些担心审稿人1不满意）两个审稿人分别提出了5个和6个问题，个别问题没那么容易回答好。
编辑：Thank you for sending us your manuscript, referenced above. We are pleased to inform you that we are potentially interested in publishing the paper in Science Advances. However, we are not prepared to accept it in its present form and would like you to revise your manuscript in response to reviewer and editorial comments. Your revised manuscript may be sent out for re-review or it may be re-assessed only by the Science Advances editor/s who previously handled it. Please note that if changes do not meet editorial expectations, your manuscript can still be rejected.
审稿人1：The idea is novel and innovative, and the results presented are interesting and worth publishing eventually. A lot of images and observations are compiled, but the discussion at this stage is very crude and does not provide a good understanding of the system. Although I consider the revision to be minor, some of the descriptions or discussions should be seriously revised to provide a better understanding of the results。
审稿人2：Based on the salient features of this work, it can be recommended for publication in Science Advances, but some revisions are recommended, as outlined below
